Tracking every major lawsuit in America

Was this
my fault?

Track the Corporate Lawsuits That May Explain Your Injury.

No. This was not your fault — and we can prove it.

You know what happened. The diagnosis. The way your child changed. The injury that upended everything. What you may not know yet is why.

Tell us what happened to you

People are searching:

We found a connection

100+Active lawsuits tracked
FreeTo find your connection
DailyNew investigations published
LawsuitWatch.ai tracks more than 100 active mass tort lawsuits in America. The service is free to use and new investigations are published every day.

Latest Investigations

What we found this week.

All Investigations →
Institutional Sexual Abuse

Institutional Sexual Abuse Lawsuits: What Court Filings Allege About Decades of Concealment by Churches, Schools, and Youth Organizations

Court documents in institutional sexual abuse cases allege systematic concealment by the Catholic Church, Boy Scouts, USA Gymnastics, and universities.

Source: In re Boy Scouts of America, No. 20-10343, Bankr. D. Del. ($2.46B Survivors’ Trust, 82,209 claims).

August 3, 2026 Read →
Sports Betting Addiction

What the Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuits Allege About DraftKings, FanDuel, and BetMGM

Lawsuits allege sports betting apps used predatory designs to create addiction. What court filings say about gambling disorder and financial devastation.

Source: Sage & Thompson v. DraftKings, Inc. et al., No. 260303384, Phila. C.C.P. (filed Mar. 24, 2026, by the Public Health Advocacy Institute).

August 3, 2026 Read →
Video Game Addiction

What The Video Game Addiction Lawsuits Allege About Activision, Epic Games, and Roblox Corporation

Lawsuits allege gaming companies used behavioral psychology techniques to create addictive platforms that harmed children and young adults.

Source: Coordinated as JCCP No. 5363, Los Angeles Superior Court; JPML order denying MDL consolidation, Dec. 2025.

August 3, 2026 Read →
Social Media Addiction

What the Social Media Addiction Lawsuits Allege About Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and Depression in Minors

Court filings allege social media companies had internal research showing their platforms could harm teen mental health but prioritized engagement over safety.

Source: In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction, MDL No. 3047, N.D. Cal.; Haugen testimony, U.S. Senate Commerce Committee, Oct. 2021.

August 2, 2026 Read →
Institutional Sexual Abuse

Institutional Sexual Abuse: The Injuries Nobody Warned You About

Court filings reveal decades of alleged concealment by churches, youth organizations, and schools. What survivors face and what the lawsuits say.

Source: In re Boy Scouts of America, No. 20-10343, Bankr. D. Del. ($2.46B Survivors’ Trust, 82,209 claims).

August 2, 2026 Read →
Sports Betting Addiction

Sports Betting Apps and Gambling Disorder: The Injuries Nobody Warned You About

How mobile sports betting platforms changed lives. What the lawsuits allege about design, addiction risk, and what companies knew.

Source: Sage & Thompson v. DraftKings, Inc. et al., No. 260303384, Phila. C.C.P. (filed Mar. 24, 2026, by the Public Health Advocacy Institute).

August 2, 2026 Read →

LawsuitWatch.ai Mass Tort Tracker

Active mass tort litigation, at a glance.

Compiled by the LawsuitWatch.ai Editorial Team from primary court records. Updated August 3, 2026.

LawsuitWatch.ai Mass Tort Tracker, updated August 3, 2026: active mass tort cases with docket, venue, scale, and status.
CaseDocket / MDLVenueScaleStatus
Institutional Sexual Abuse In re Boy Scouts of America, No. 20-10343 (Bankr. D. Del.) Bankr. D. Del.; state Child Victims Act windows $2.46B Survivors’ Trust; 82,209 abuse claims Active — trust & ongoing suits
Sports Betting Addiction Sage & Thompson v. DraftKings, Inc. et al., No. 260303384 (Phila. C.C.P.) Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County; Mass. Superior Court Landmark filings vs. DraftKings, FanDuel, Genius Sports, NFL Active — early filings
Video Game Addiction JCCP No. 5363, Los Angeles Superior Court, Calif. JCCP No. 5363, Los Angeles Superior Court (Judge Jessner) 100+ coordinated cases; federal MDL denied by JPML (Dec. 2025) Active — coordinated proceeding
Social Media Addiction MDL No. 3047 (4:22-md-03047-YGR), N.D. Cal. MDL No. 3047, N.D. Cal. (Judge Gonzalez Rogers); parallel JCCP 5255, Calif. 2,600+ federal cases; 41-state AG action Active — MDL pending

Figures reflect public court filings as of the date above and are updated as dockets change. Full source citations appear on each case page.

Why We Built This

The question nobody
was answering.

When something devastating happens — a cancer diagnosis, a child who changed overnight, an injury that altered your life — the first thing most people feel is confusion.

Every attorney website skips this moment entirely. They go straight to compensation, free consultations, legal jargon. They miss the most important thing you need to hear first.

About LawsuitWatch.ai. LawsuitWatch.ai is an independent investigative publication tracking more than 100 active mass tort lawsuits in the United States — covering pharmaceuticals, medical devices, social media and gaming platforms, sports-betting apps, institutional abuse, and environmental contamination. We are published by the LawsuitWatch.ai Editorial Team and operated by Mass Tort Ad Agency, a plaintiff-side legal marketing firm. Mass Tort Ad Agency earns a referral fee when a reader chooses to be connected with an attorney; that referral business is kept strictly separate from editorial work, and no company, law firm, or advertiser pays for, reviews, or influences which cases we cover or what our investigations conclude. We are not a law firm and we do not provide legal advice.

This was not your fault. A company knew what their product could do to you. They had the data. They made a choice. That choice had your name on it.

We track every major lawsuit so that when the truth comes out — and it always does — you are the first to know.

How We Report

Editorial standards.

Primary sources only

Every investigation is built from court records — MDL and JCCP dockets, bankruptcy filings, and complaints — alongside internal company research disclosed in litigation, FDA and other regulatory records, congressional testimony, and peer-reviewed studies. The specific docket or filing is cited on each case.

What we will not do

We do not invent statistics, fabricate quotes, or assert that a lawsuit exists where it does not. Where a federal MDL has been requested but denied — as with video game addiction — we say so plainly. Marketing language is kept separate from the factual record.

Updates & corrections

We run weekly docket checks against federal records on PACER and state coordinated-proceeding portals, including the California JCCP e-filing system, and update tracked cases as their status changes. One change already reflected here: in December 2025 the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation declined to create a federal MDL for the video game addiction cases, so we corrected that case to point to its California JCCP No. 5363 coordinated proceeding instead. Found something wrong? Tell us and we will fix it. Every page shows when it was last reviewed.

How It Works

From question to answer
in four steps.

No pressure. No obligation. Just clarity on where you stand.

  1. Find the docket

    Look up the case by its MDL or JCCP number — each case page lists it. Federal cases are searchable on PACER (pacer.uscourts.gov); California coordinated proceedings are on the Los Angeles Superior Court e-filing portal. You can also start by searching your diagnosis or product here.

    Public records, free to search

  2. Read the master complaint

    Open the master complaint and the internal documents disclosed in the litigation to see what the company knew and when. Our investigation for each case summarizes these filings in plain language and cites the docket.

    The documented record

  3. Check the plaintiff criteria

    Compare your diagnosis, timeframe, and product or platform use against the eligibility criteria set out in the complaint. This tells you whether your situation fits the case — before you talk to anyone.

    Decide for yourself first

  4. Connect with counsel (optional)

    If your situation matches and you choose to pursue a claim, we can connect you with an attorney handling that litigation. This step is entirely optional and free; these cases are handled on contingency.

    Optional, no upfront cost