Tracking every major lawsuit in America

Was this
my fault?

Track the Corporate Lawsuits That May Explain Your Injury.

No. This was not your fault — and we can prove it.

You know what happened. The diagnosis. The way your child changed. The injury that upended everything. What you may not know yet is why.

Tell us what happened to you

People are searching:

We found a connection

100+Active lawsuits tracked
FreeTo find your connection
DailyNew investigations published
LawsuitWatch.ai tracks more than 100 active mass tort lawsuits in America. The service is free to use and new investigations are published every day.

Latest Investigations

What we found this week.

All Investigations →
AI Chatbot Harm

AI Chatbot Harm Litigation: Timeline and Current Status

A timeline of lawsuits alleging harm from AI chatbots, including wrongful death and psychological injury claims against Character.AI and OpenAI.

October 24, 2026 Read →
Baby Food Heavy Metals

Baby Food Heavy Metals Litigation: Timeline and Current Status

Timeline of the baby food heavy metals MDL, from the 2021 Congressional report through expert rulings and dismissals as of August 2026.

October 24, 2026 Read →
Bard PowerPort

Bard PowerPort Litigation Timeline and Current Status

Timeline of the Bard PowerPort MDL No. 3081 in Arizona federal court, from formation through bellwether trials and current case count.

October 24, 2026 Read →
Benzene Exposure

Benzene Exposure Litigation: Timeline and Current Status

A timeline of benzene exposure lawsuits involving sunscreens, dry shampoos, and other consumer products, tracked from the court record.

October 24, 2026 Read →
Camp Lejeune Water Contamination

Camp Lejeune Water Contamination Litigation: Timeline and Current Status

A timeline of the Camp Lejeune water contamination litigation, from the 2022 Justice Act through settlement offers and court filings.

October 24, 2026 Read →
Depo-Provera

Depo-Provera Meningioma Litigation Timeline and Current Status

Timeline of the Depo-Provera meningioma MDL from formation through settlement agreement, with current case status as of October 2026.

October 24, 2026 Read →

LawsuitWatch.ai Mass Tort Tracker

Active mass tort litigation, at a glance.

Compiled by the LawsuitWatch.ai Editorial Team from primary court records. Updated November 11, 2026.

LawsuitWatch.ai Mass Tort Tracker, updated November 11, 2026: active mass tort cases with docket, venue, scale, and status.
CaseDocket / MDLVenueScaleStatus

Figures reflect public court filings as of the date above and are updated as dockets change. Full source citations appear on each case page.

Why We Built This

The question nobody
was answering.

When something devastating happens — a cancer diagnosis, a child who changed overnight, an injury that altered your life — the first thing most people feel is confusion.

Every attorney website skips this moment entirely. They go straight to compensation, free consultations, legal jargon. They miss the most important thing you need to hear first.

About LawsuitWatch.ai. LawsuitWatch.ai is an independent investigative publication tracking more than 100 active mass tort lawsuits in the United States — covering pharmaceuticals, medical devices, social media and gaming platforms, sports-betting apps, institutional abuse, and environmental contamination. We are published by the LawsuitWatch.ai Editorial Team and operated by Mass Tort Ad Agency, a plaintiff-side legal marketing firm. Mass Tort Ad Agency earns a referral fee when a reader chooses to be connected with an attorney; that referral business is kept strictly separate from editorial work, and no company, law firm, or advertiser pays for, reviews, or influences which cases we cover or what our investigations conclude. We are not a law firm and we do not provide legal advice.

This was not your fault. A company knew what their product could do to you. They had the data. They made a choice. That choice had your name on it.

We track every major lawsuit so that when the truth comes out — and it always does — you are the first to know.

How We Report

Editorial standards.

Primary sources only

Every investigation is built from court records — MDL and JCCP dockets, bankruptcy filings, and complaints — alongside internal company research disclosed in litigation, FDA and other regulatory records, congressional testimony, and peer-reviewed studies. The specific docket or filing is cited on each case.

What we will not do

We do not invent statistics, fabricate quotes, or assert that a lawsuit exists where it does not. Where a federal MDL has been requested but denied — as with video game addiction — we say so plainly. Marketing language is kept separate from the factual record.

Updates & corrections

We run weekly docket checks against federal records on PACER and state coordinated-proceeding portals, including the California JCCP e-filing system, and update tracked cases as their status changes. One change already reflected here: in December 2025 the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation declined to create a federal MDL for the video game addiction cases, so we corrected that case to point to its California JCCP No. 5363 coordinated proceeding instead. Found something wrong? Tell us and we will fix it. Every page shows when it was last reviewed.

How It Works

From question to answer
in four steps.

No pressure. No obligation. Just clarity on where you stand.

  1. Find the docket

    Look up the case by its MDL or JCCP number — each case page lists it. Federal cases are searchable on PACER (pacer.uscourts.gov); California coordinated proceedings are on the Los Angeles Superior Court e-filing portal. You can also start by searching your diagnosis or product here.

    Public records, free to search

  2. Read the master complaint

    Open the master complaint and the internal documents disclosed in the litigation to see what the company knew and when. Our investigation for each case summarizes these filings in plain language and cites the docket.

    The documented record

  3. Check the plaintiff criteria

    Compare your diagnosis, timeframe, and product or platform use against the eligibility criteria set out in the complaint. This tells you whether your situation fits the case — before you talk to anyone.

    Decide for yourself first

  4. Connect with counsel (optional)

    If your situation matches and you choose to pursue a claim, we can connect you with an attorney handling that litigation. This step is entirely optional and free; these cases are handled on contingency.

    Optional, no upfront cost